Appraisals: Comparing Apples to Lemons

Submit A Comment | View Comments

Ever since the foreclosure epidemic started, builders have complained that it makes no sense to use foreclosed properties as comparables when assessing the value of new homes, even if they do account for half of home sales in some markets. Foreclosed homes may have the same bedroom and bathroom count, they may have the same square footage. But the previous owners may have pulled the home's copper wire, taken the appliances, or broken the granite countertops out of frustration of dealing with the bank.

The problem is that appraisers in most cases never go inside the house to inspect. They get the record for the sale price of the home, stand at the curb, and eyeball the home to determine its value. They may be looking at a home that's actually worth 10 or 20 percent less because its interiors or its systems are a mess. The home may have lost even more value because a cash-strapped bank was frantic to unload it.

Not only have builder complaints about unfair appraisals largely fallen on deaf ears, but a new system went into effect on May 1 that may drive down appraised values even further. Builders are likely to see more situations where buyers are perfectly willing to pay $250,000 for a new home, and banks are perfectly willing to make a loan for that amount, but the appraisal comes in at $220,000, wiping out all the profit in the deal, or killing it completely.

Under new rules that apply to any mortgage sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, loan officers, mortgage brokers, and real estate agents can no longer hire appraisers directly to do the work. Instead, they have to work through an appraisal management company. The cost of the typical appraisal is going to increase by about $200 to pay for the services of a middleman. 

Critics of the Home Valuation Code of Conduct say these management companies are more often hiring appraisers who aren't familiar with resale values in neighborhoods. They may not know the history of the neighborhood--how values have always held up due to good schools, strong community fabric, or adjacent shopping. They may not understand that the foreclosed property they are eyeballing is an exception to the rule.

Yesterday, the National Association of Home Builders issued a statement on the situation, arguing that using foreclosures and distressed sales as comparables "without adequately reflecting the differences in the condition of the respective properties is needlessly driving down home values." The group called for "proper regulatory guidelines" for use on foreclosure or distressed property sales.

What's your recent experience with appraisals?

 
 

Comments (6 Total)

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 11:32 AM Thursday, July 02, 2009

    Foreclosures should be treated as aberrations in the market. Their sales should be reflected as sales below market value especally since banks do not normally need full market value to be made whole, their condition may be questionable especially those that have sat empty for long periods. The below market appeal of the foreclosure may impact the sale of resales and new construction which in turn may drive sales prices lower, and hence ultimately market value, but it is unfair to use foreclosures directly as comps.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Matt Cook | Time: 11:13 PM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    Good, ethical, competent, professional appraisers do not perform the sort of quickie, slipshod "analysis" you describe, blindly comparing trashed homes to well-maintained ones without recognizing the difference. Newer, poorly-trained appraisers may do this, and are more likely to when a national Appraisal Management Company (AMC) sends them out of their area and requires a report in 24 hours, choosing them not for their experience and competence, but because they promised the lowest fee and the fastest turnaround. Verifying the condition of comparable sales takes time and know-how. Finding out if there were unusual motivations or sales conditions--desperate seller, highly-motivated buyer, etc.--takes time and know-how. And time is money. You simply cannot get the highest quality appraisal for the lowest price. With tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars at stake, insist on experienced, professional, locally-experienced appraisers. Membership in a nationally-recognized professional organization such as the Appraisal Institute, National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers, or the American Society of Appraisers is a good indication of professionalism. I must clarify one statement in your piece, however. Some may infer that Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac require the use of Appraisal Management Companies. This is not the case, as made clear in Fannie Mae's HVCC FAQs (https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/annltrs/pdf/2009/0901.pdf). As long as the loan-origination function is kept separate from the appraisal function, mortgage lenders are free to use their own appraisers, either in-house or as part of a fee panel. As an appraiser with 20 years' experience, I applaud you for bringing to light some of the unintended consequences of this wrong-headed Code.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: John C. Carlson | Time: 5:09 PM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    Mr. Thompson, I am an experienced appraiser with 31-years of valuation experience. The "experienced appraiser" has access to MLS where Agents include photos of the listed properties in the Listing. In addition, "experienced appraisers" know that you must call one of the principals to the transaction to confirm what the condition of the REO property. The issue now is that appraisers who work for AMCs are not being given the time to complete credible reports. Most AMCs require delivery of the appraisal within 24-hours of when a property is inspected. All of that being said, I have to point out that I quit appraising in new tracts over two years ago because builders were flat out lying to my face about the tens of thousands of dollars in Concessions & freebies they were packing into new home transactions. This is one reason that Wells Fargo made the requirement that appraisers had to use non-builder, non-new tract comps. The point I'm making is that even if non-REO Comps are used, appraisers must still adjust for the huge Concessions that builders are allowing. We must adhere to the Definition of Market Value which says that the property must be valued based upon "cash-to-the-seller. Either way, the appraised value will not come in at the sales price which includes thousands of dollars of concessions. John C. Carlson www.jccrea.com

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 4:25 PM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    Appraisals have always been inexact science that banks are placing too much faith in. Appraisals merely scratch the surface when it comes to the content of the comps, while knowing the exact content & cost of new construction. If a builder/designer builds a sustainable home, his costs might be up 10% but the adjustments never cover the difference. It always has been a faulty process and I will be surprised if there are any changes made now, but it sure would be nice to see the bankers put more faith in what the market will bear (purchase contract) than a set of assumptive subjective adjustments.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 4:00 PM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    we are seeing homes in the resale market that are getting multiple offers above listing price because our supply of homes has dried up. these listing prices were set in response to the pressure from REO sales from the past. the supply of distressed homes and dried up and now the market is in balance with most of the listings being non distressed. with the new long distance appraisals coming in way low, these deals are hard to close. typically a local appraiser has to defend his appraisal and they bring the out of town appraiser to actually look at the property. he then adjusts his appraisal upward, but never to the original local appraisal. everyone loses when the free market forces of supply and demand are not allowed to work. hopefully the rule on appraisals will get revised to take into account the local nature of housing pricing and those who know it best.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: MousePusher | Time: 3:34 PM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    Thanks Mr. Thompson for your inciteful views.. they are appreciated! Interesting that Fannie/Freddie would want to move to a managed or centralized system of appraisal,but, then again, maybe I do. If you want to control the atrition of foreclosures, you have to be able to control price, what better way than having it managed by a regional office instead of a locally owned, bonified and certified appraisal service. This is a huge barrier to for contractors trying to inject themselves into the marketplace with good product. Best to stear clear of Fannie/Freddie and go with a local bank like Credit Unions, S & L's, regional banks or Contractor Capital Groups that understand current and local market conditions. Fannie/Freddie have their place in assisting first-timers and development contractors making linkages in producing sales... but we as Contractors, Small Businesses, Designers, Architects, Engineers, and every other taxpayer keep bailing out these two institutions; Lets look at this from another vantage point... If these two entities have that much market clout, and are too big to fail, then they should be broken up into smaller, more 'manageable' parts. Thus, local appraisal services won't have to close due to 50% of their business disappearing overnight.

    Report this as offensive

Comment on this Post

Post your comment below. If you wish, enter a username and password though they are not required. Please read our Content Guidelines before posting.

 

Enter the code shown in the image

Username is optional

 

Enter a password if you want a username

 
 

About the Blogger

Boyce Thompson

thumbnail image Boyce Thompson is editorial director of the BUILDER group of magazines published by Hanley Wood, LLC. He also directs the company’s editorial council. In addition to BUILDER, Thompson serves as editorial director of Big Builder, Multifamily Executive, Digital Home, Developer, Affordable Housing Finance, and Apartment Finance Today magazines. Thompson has 26 years of experience writing and editing articles about home building, architecture, and retailing. He earned a M.A. in Journalism from the University of Missouri and holds a B.S. degree in English Literature from Northwestern University.